The text, verbatim
Everything above is derived from the text reproduced here. Read it
before relying on any summary.
§ 241.051(a) Who may come and look — and whether they must
Effective 1989-09-01
Sec. 241.051. INSPECTIONS. (a) The department may make any inspection, survey, or investigation that it considers necessary. A representative of the department may enter the premises of a hospital at any reasonable time to make an inspection, a survey, or an investigation to assure compliance with or prevent a violation of this chapter, the rules adopted under this chapter, an order or special order of the commissioner, a special license provision, a court order granting injunctive relief, or other enforcement procedures. The department shall maintain the confidentiality of hospital records as applicable under state or federal law.
Official text
The verb is "may". Nothing in this subsection obliges the department to open an investigation because a complaint was filed. Amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 3.0576, eff. April 2, 2015; Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 42 (H.B. 49), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
§ 241.051(b) How far the access reaches
Effective 1989-09-01
(b) The department or a representative of the department is entitled to access to all books, records, or other documents maintained by or on behalf of the hospital to the extent necessary to enforce this chapter, the rules adopted under this chapter, an order or special order of the commissioner, a special license provision, a court order granting injunctive relief, or other enforcement procedures.
Official text
The access is bounded by purpose, not by document type: it runs to whatever is necessary to enforce the chapter. It is a right held against the hospital, not a right anyone can invoke to obtain records.
§ 241.051(c) The hospital has already consented
Effective 1989-09-01
(c) By applying for or holding a hospital license, the hospital consents to entry and inspection of the hospital by the department or a representative of the department in accordance with this chapter and the rules adopted under this chapter.
Official text
Consent is constructive and runs from the licence. No individual employed by the hospital grants or withholds anything here.
§ 241.051(d) The complaint file is confidential — with five named recipients
Effective 1989-09-01
(d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), all information and materials in the possession of or obtained or compiled by the commission in connection with a complaint and investigation concerning a hospital are confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, and not subject to disclosure, discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for their release to anyone other than the commission or its employees or agents involved in the enforcement action except that this information may be disclosed to: (1) persons involved with the commission in the enforcement action against the hospital; (2) the hospital that is the subject of the enforcement action, or the hospital's authorized representative; (3) appropriate state or federal agencies that are authorized to inspect, survey, or investigate hospital services; (4) law enforcement agencies; and (5) persons engaged in bona fide research, if all individual-identifying and hospital-identifying information has been deleted.
Official text
This is the paragraph Sec. 258.006(c)(1) points at, so it is the confidentiality rule behind a chapter 258 complaint as well. Note the third item: confidentiality here is confidentiality against the public, not withholding from the employer. Amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 3.0576, eff. April 2, 2015; Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 42 (H.B. 49), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
§ 241.051(e) What may be released anyway — once the identifiers are gone
Effective 1989-09-01
(e) The following information is subject to disclosure in accordance with Chapter 552, Government Code, only to the extent that all personally identifiable information of a patient or health care provider is omitted from the information: (1) a notice of the hospital's alleged violation, which must include the provisions of law the hospital is alleged to have violated, and a general statement of the nature of the alleged violation; (2) the number of investigations the commission has conducted of the hospital; (3) the pleadings in any administrative proceeding to impose a penalty against the hospital for the alleged violation; (4) the outcome of each investigation the commission conducted of the hospital, including: (A) the issuance of a reprimand; (B) the denial or revocation of a license; (C) the adoption of a corrective action plan; or (D) the imposition of an administrative penalty and the penalty amount; and (5) a final decision, investigative report, or order issued by the commission to address the alleged violation.
Official text
The opening clause protects a health care provider's personally identifiable information on the same footing as a patient's. This is the provision that speaks to whether a reporter's name travels with the file. Amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 3.0576, eff. April 2, 2015; Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 42 (H.B. 49), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
§ 241.051(f) Ninety days to publish — the only number in the section
Effective 1989-09-01
(f) Not later than the 90th day after the date the commission issues a final decision, investigative report, or order to address a hospital's alleged violation, the commission shall post on the commission's Internet website: (1) the notice of alleged violation described by Subsection (e)(1); (2) the name of the hospital; (3) the geographic location of the hospital; (4) the date the commission issued the final decision, investigative report, or order; and (5) the outcome of the commission's investigation of the hospital that includes the information described by Subsection (e)(4).
Official text
The clock runs from the final decision, investigative report or order — not from the complaint, and not from the inspection. Amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 3.0576, eff. April 2, 2015; Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 42 (H.B. 49), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
§ 241.051(g) Two years it cannot be taken down
Effective 1989-09-01
(g) The commission may not remove information posted on the commission's Internet website under Subsection (f) before the second anniversary of the date the information is posted on the Internet website.
Official text
A floor, not a ceiling: the subsection bars removal before two years and says nothing about how long after that it stays. Amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 3.0576, eff. April 2, 2015; Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 42 (H.B. 49), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2023.
§ 241.051(h) What this section does not touch
Effective 1989-09-01
(h) Nothing in this section precludes a hospital from releasing medical records in the hospital's possession: (1) on the request of the patient who is the subject of the record; or (2) to the patient, the parent or guardian of a patient who is a minor or incapacitated, or the personal representative of a patient who is deceased.
Official text
This is about a patient reaching their own record. It gives a nurse nothing: the subsection is not a route to the investigation file.
§ 489.53(a)(10) The receiving hospital has to report — this is an institutional duty
Effective 1980-04-04
(10) In the case of a hospital or a critical access hospital as defined in section 1861(mm)(1) of the Act that has reason to believe it may have received an individual transferred by another hospital in violation of § 489.24(d), the hospital failed to report the incident to CMS or the State survey agency.
Official text
The duty is the hospital's, not an individual nurse's, and the trigger is "reason to believe", not proof. It is listed as a basis for terminating the agreement, which is what gives it force.
§ 489.53(a)(18) Refusing the surveyors is itself a basis for termination
Effective 1980-04-04
(18) The provider or supplier fails to grant immediate access upon a reasonable request to a state survey agency or other authorized entity for the purpose of determining, in accordance with § 488.3, whether the provider or supplier meets the applicable requirements, conditions of participation, conditions for coverage, or conditions for certification.
Official text
The federal counterpart to Sec. 241.051(b) is framed as immediate access on reasonable request. Unlike the Texas provision it is not phrased as a purpose-limited entitlement; it is a failing that carries a consequence.
§ 489.53(b)(1) The consequence for an EMTALA violation
Effective 1980-04-04
(b) Termination of agreements with certain hospitals. In the case of a hospital or critical access hospital that has an emergency department, as defined in § 489.24(b), CMS may terminate the provider agreement if— (1) The hospital fails to comply with the requirements of § 489.24 (a) through (e), which require the hospital to examine, treat, or transfer emergency medical condition cases appropriately, and require that hospitals with specialized capabilities or facilities accept an appropriate transfer; or
Official text
Cell 9 sets out what Sec. 489.24(a) through (e) require; this is the only consequence that section attaches, and it is not one that runs to an individual. "May" again — CMS is not obliged to terminate.
§ 489.53(b)(2) The consequence for not reporting or not posting
Effective 1980-04-04
(2) The hospital fails to comply with § 489.20(m), (q), and (r), which require the hospital to report suspected violations of § 489.24(e), to post conspicuously in emergency departments or in a place or places likely to be noticed by all individuals entering the emergency departments, as well as those individuals waiting for examination and treatment in areas other than traditional emergency departments, (that is, entrance, admitting area, waiting room, treatment area), signs specifying rights of individuals under this subpart, to post conspicuously information indicating whether or not the hospital participates in the Medicaid program, and to maintain medical and other records related to transferred individuals for a period of 5 years, a list of on-call physicians for individuals with emergency medical conditions, and a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department seeking assistance.
Official text
The five-year record retention and the central log are the two items that outlive an individual complaint. Sec. 489.20 itself is not collected on this page.
§ 489.53(d)(1) Fifteen days of notice
Effective 1980-04-04
(d) Notice of termination — (1) Timing: basic rule. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section, CMS gives the provider notice of termination at least 15 days before the effective date of termination of the provider agreement.
Official text
The baseline notice period before termination takes effect.
§ 489.53(d)(2)(i) Immediate jeopardy — twenty-three days, then two to four
Effective 1980-04-04
(i) Hospitals. If CMS finds that a hospital is in violation of § 489.24(a) through (f), and CMS determines that the violation poses immediate jeopardy to the health or safety of individuals who present themselves to the hospital for emergency services, CMS— (A) Gives the hospital a preliminary notice indicating that its provider agreement will be terminated in 23 days if it does not correct the identified deficiencies or refute the finding; and (B) Gives a final notice of termination, and concurrent notice to the public, at least 2 , but not more than 4, days before the effective date of termination of the provider agreement.
Official text
Note that this paragraph reaches Sec. 489.24(a) through (f) while subparagraph (b)(1) reaches (a) through (e). The extra paragraph is in the text of both places; nothing reconciles them and this page does not try to.
§ 489.53(d)(5) The public is told — but only here
Effective 1980-04-04
(5) Notice to public. CMS concurrently gives notice of the termination to the public.
Official text
Read against Sec. 241.051(f) and (g): the federal text requires public notice of a termination and gives no deadline, no website, and no period it must stay up. The Texas text gives ninety days and two years. Neither says the other is wrong.
§ 489.53(e) The hospital may appeal
Effective 1980-04-04
(e) Appeal by the provider. A provider may appeal the termination of its provider agreement by CMS in accordance with part 498 of this chapter.
Official text
The appeal belongs to the provider. Part 498 is not collected here.