NurseCheck · Retaliation

What Happens To You After You Refuse, Report, Or Speak Up

Two sections of the Texas Health and Safety Code prohibit a hospital from retaliating against a nurse. Sec. 258.005, enacted in 2009, protects a nurse who refuses mandatory overtime or reports a violation of chapter 258. Sec. 257.006, added in 2025, protects a nurse who provides information to the nurse staffing committee or reports a violation of chapter 257. Each protects an act the other does not name. Neither chapter contains its own penalty: both route enforcement through the same sentence into whichever licensing chapter the hospital holds, "as if" the hospital had violated that chapter instead. This page sets out what each section says, where enforcement goes, and what is waiting there. It does not tell you what happened to you, and it does not tell you what to collect.

Tex. Health & Safety Code 258.005, 258.006(a), 257.003(a), 257.003(a)(5), 257.004(a), 257.006, 257.007(a), 241.055(a)-(b), 241.056; 42 CFR 485.622(e) — Retaliation — two chapters that protect different acts, and a federal text that uses the word the other way Official text

Check your situation

Answer the questions below. The result shows the rules that turn on your answers, the statutory text behind them, and the facts you still need to confirm yourself.

1. What did you do?

Both anti-retaliation sections are written conditionally — each protects a nurse who did a particular thing. The answer decides which section is even speaking to your situation, and the two do not overlap as much as their headings suggest.

2. What did the hospital do afterwards?

Sec. 258.005 names four forbidden acts: suspend, terminate, or otherwise discipline or discriminate. Sec. 257.006 says only "retaliate" and lists nothing. Which section applies changes how much the text tells you about your own situation.

3. What do you want to know?

The four questions lead to different places: one section, one bridge, one penalty, one route to court, and one federal sentence. The answer decides which of those this page puts in front of you first.

4. What is the hospital licensed under?

Both chapters send enforcement to a different body of law depending on the licence: Subchapter C of chapter 241, or chapter 577 and its rules. This is the one fact here that is entirely outside the statutes and entirely decisive.

What turns on your answers

What to document

A record-keeping aid built from what the law makes relevant.

If you need to escalate

The text, verbatim

Everything above is derived from the text reproduced here. Read it before relying on any summary.

§ 258.005 Retaliation prohibited — chapter 258

Effective 2009-09-01
Sec. 258.005. RETALIATION PROHIBITED. A hospital may not suspend, terminate, or otherwise discipline or discriminate against a nurse who refuses to work mandatory overtime or reports violations of this chapter to hospital management or the commission.

Official text Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 742 (S.B. 476), Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 2009. Amended by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 398 (H.B. 2187), Sec. 5, eff. 1 September 2025. The 2025 amendment is listed in the section credits; the wording reproduced above is the current text. This section protects three things and only three: refusing mandatory overtime, reporting to hospital management, and reporting to the commission. It does not protect providing input to a nurse staffing committee — that protection is in chapter 257 and is quoted below.

§ 257.006 Prohibited retaliation — chapter 257

Effective 2025-09-01
Sec. 257.006. PROHIBITED RETALIATION. A hospital may not retaliate against a nurse who provides information to the committee or reports violations of this chapter to hospital management or the commission.

Official text Added by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 398 (H.B. 2187), Sec. 3, eff. 1 September 2025. Chapter 257 was enacted in 2009 without an anti-retaliation section; this one is new as of September 2025. Two differences from Sec. 258.005 are visible on the face of the text. First, the forbidden act is 'retaliate' with no list, where Sec. 258.005 names four acts (suspend, terminate, otherwise discipline, discriminate). Second, the protected act includes providing information to the committee, which Sec. 258.005 never mentions. Neither section defines retaliate, discipline or discriminate.

§ 257.003(a) The policy must include a process for — opening words

Effective 2009-09-01
Sec. 257.003. NURSE STAFFING POLICY AND PLAN. (a) The governing body of a hospital shall adopt, implement, and enforce a written nurse staffing policy to ensure that an adequate number and skill mix of nurses are available to meet the level of patient care needed. The policy must include a process for:

Official text Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 742 (S.B. 476), Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 2009. Quoted here only for its opening words, so that the item quoted next has its subject. The duty is on the governing body, and the object is a written policy that must include a process. What follows the colon is a list of six items; item (5) is quoted separately below.

§ 257.003(a)(5) The policy itself must protect from retaliation

Effective 2009-09-01
(5) protecting from retaliation nurses who provide input to the committee; and

Official text Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 742 (S.B. 476), Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 2009 — sixteen years before Sec. 257.006 was added. This is a third and separate layer: even before the legislature prohibited retaliation by the hospital in 2025, it required every hospital's own written policy to contain a process protecting nurses who give input to the committee. A nurse who is looking for what the hospital promised can start with the hospital's own policy, which the hospital was required to write. This cell does not tell the reader what that policy says.

§ 257.004(a) The committee is a standing committee of the hospital

Effective 2009-09-01
Sec. 257.004. NURSE STAFFING COMMITTEE. (a) A hospital shall establish a nurse staffing committee as a standing committee of the hospital.

Official text Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 742 (S.B. 476), Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 2009. Quoted because Sec. 257.006 and Sec. 257.003(a)(5) both protect input 'to the committee' without saying what the committee is. It is a committee the hospital is required to establish, and it is a standing committee — not a body convened for an occasion.

§ 258.006(a) How chapter 258 is enforced — the bridge

Effective 2025-09-01
Sec. 258.006. ENFORCEMENT; COMPLAINT RESOLUTION. (a) The commission shall enforce this chapter in accordance with: (1) Subchapter C, Chapter 241, against a hospital licensed under that chapter as if the hospital violated that chapter; (2) Chapter 577 and rules adopted under Sections 577.010 and 577.013, against a hospital licensed under Chapter 577 as if the hospital violated that chapter; and (3) rules adopted under Section 241.026(a).

Official text Added by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 398 (H.B. 2187), Sec. 6, eff. 1 September 2025. The words that carry the weight are 'as if'. Chapter 258 does not create its own penalty; it directs that a violation be treated as a violation of whichever licensing chapter the hospital is licensed under. Everything the nurse can obtain therefore depends on a chapter the nurse did not act under.

§ 257.007(a) How chapter 257 is enforced — the same bridge, word for word

Effective 2025-09-01
Sec. 257.007. ENFORCEMENT; COMPLAINT RESOLUTION. (a) The commission shall enforce this chapter in accordance with: (1) Subchapter C, Chapter 241, against a hospital licensed under that chapter as if the hospital violated that chapter; (2) Chapter 577 and rules adopted under Sections 577.010 and 577.013, against a hospital licensed under Chapter 577 as if the hospital violated that chapter; and (3) rules adopted under Section 241.026(a).

Official text Added by Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 398 (H.B. 2187), Sec. 3, eff. 1 September 2025. This is the same text as Sec. 258.006(a) with the section number changed — the 2025 act wrote the same enforcement bridge into both chapters at once. A complaint about retaliation under either chapter lands in the same machinery, under the same licensing chapter, with the same confidentiality rules.

§ 241.055(a) Civil penalty — what the hospital must do

Effective 1989-09-01
Sec. 241.055. CIVIL PENALTY. (a) A hospital shall timely adopt, implement, and enforce a patient transfer policy in accordance with Section 241.027. A hospital may implement patient transfer agreements in accordance with Section 241.028.

Official text Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 1989; amended 1991 and 1993. Quoted for one reason: Sec. 241.056(a), quoted below, gives a private right to sue for a violation 'under Section 241.028 or 241.055'. Subsection (a) is what Sec. 241.055 is nominally about — patient transfer policies — and it has nothing to do with retaliation. Subsection (b) is the part that reaches further.

§ 241.055(b) Civil penalty — the amount, and how far it reaches

Effective 1989-09-01
(b) A hospital that violates Subsection (a), another provision of this chapter, or a rule adopted or enforced under this chapter is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000 for each day of violation and for each act of violation. A hospital that violates this chapter or a rule or order adopted under this chapter relating to the provision of mental health, chemical dependency, or rehabilitation services is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 for each day of violation and for each act of violation.

Official text Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 1989; amended 1991 and 1993. The reach of this subsection is the point: 'another provision of this chapter'. Chapter 257 and chapter 258 are not this chapter, and whether the 'as if' bridge in Sec. 257.007(a) or Sec. 258.006(a) carries a violation of those chapters into this subsection is a question the statute does not answer in terms. Both readings are stated on the page; this cell does not choose between them. Note also what the money is: a penalty the hospital is liable for, not damages paid to the nurse.

§ 241.056 Suit by person harmed

Effective 1989-09-01
Sec. 241.056. SUIT BY PERSON HARMED. (a) A person who is harmed by a violation under Section 241.028 or 241.055 may petition a district court for appropriate injunctive relief. (b) Venue for a suit brought under this section is in the county in which the person resides or, if the person is not a resident of this state, in Travis County. (c) The person may also pursue remedies for civil damages under common law.

Official text Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 678, Sec. 1, eff. 1 September 1989; amended 1991 and 1993. Three things this section does, and one it does not. It gives a route to a district court. It fixes venue in the nurse's own county. It says the person may also pursue damages — but 'under common law', which is to say under law this section does not contain. What it does not give is damages under this section: the only relief it provides is injunctive. A nurse who has already been fired is asking for something this sentence was not written to provide.

§ 485.622(e) The only 'retaliation' in the federal conditions of participation

(e) Standard: Restraint or seclusion. All patients have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse, and corporal punishment. All patients have the right to be free from restraint or seclusion, of any form, imposed as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation by staff.

Official text 42 CFR 485.622(e), read from the eCFR. This is the whole reason the federal side of this cell is short. The word retaliation appears exactly once in 42 CFR part 485 subpart F, and this is it. The sentence is a patient right: it forbids restraint or seclusion imposed as retaliation by staff. The nurse in this sentence is not the person protected — the nurse is staff, and staff are the ones the sentence is directed against. Searched across the full text of subpart F on 17 September 2026 for 'retaliat', 'discriminat', 'whistleblow' and 'reprisal': one hit, this one, and zero for the other three terms. The search and its scope are recorded in scripts/raw_cell8_federal_negative.txt so it can be re-run. An effective date is not recorded here because the capture did not carry one; it is shown as not captured rather than guessed.

What this page does not cover

Other checks